Why The Moon Landings Weren’t Faked

S G Collins, a Netherlands filmmaker, ponders possibility Moon Landings were hoaxed?  Collins concludes in You Tube Video, "moon hoax not,"  Moon Landings couldn't of been faked!  "In 1969 it was not yet possible technically to fake what we saw [on TV]," argues Collins.  A filmmaker's perspective, who offers technical arguments and 30 years experience, makes video of high interest!  Collins advises Moon Hoax may serve to distract Americans from more important issues that are real such as Patriot Act, Iraq War, financial industry bailouts and indefinite military detention without charge!  A riveting and curious video you will watch more than once!   Thanks goes to Universe Today for link!

Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land On The Moon?

Moon Landing Conspiracy Theories are a cottage industry. Are the theories credible? Bill Kaysing, author of 1974 book "We Never Went to the Moon: Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle," offers persuasive arguments in 2001 Fox Documentary, "Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land On The Moon." Kaysing summarizes observations of pictures and video taken on the Moon: no stars, no thrust crater underneath Apollo Lunar Module (LM) and no apparent thrust on return ascent back to the Command Module. The LM seems pulled up by a cable, adds Kaysing. It's, perhaps, the small details that betray a fake. Kaysing points out lack of any dust on LM's landing pads, although lunar dust observed to be very fine in videos! Astronauts remained healthy never suffering any adverse effects from radiation, despite passing through the Van Allen Radiation Belt. There are good arguments made in the Fox Special, but NASA reps seem detached never responding directly to evidence. NASA may feel more to lose than gain as upwards of 80 percent still believe we went to the Moon?. Physicist Michio Kaku does better job answering Moon hoax criticisms here. The present writer remains skeptical whether LM technically up to the task?   There's nothing to see here.  NASA faked pix and video, but we actually went - just technical difficulty - with pix and video as some argue?

Apollo 11 Moon Landing Site - Now Seen in Unprecedented Detail

The Daily Galaxy details in article repeated attempts to provide public with hi-res images of original 1969 Moon Landing. First, images provided by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) are hyped:

"The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera snapped its best look yet of the Apollo 11 landing site on the moon. The image, which was released on March 7, 2012, even shows the remnants of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin's historic first steps on the surface around the Lunar Module.This image of the Apollo 11 landing site captured from just 24 km (15 miles) above the surface provides LRO's best look yet at humanity’s first venture to another world."

A viewer is soon disillusioned, however, with images as there's signs of Photoshop editing. Northerntruthseeker does excellent job arguing for a continued Apollo hoax. A You Tube video, "the proof that the LRO photos are photoshopped," shows what images actually look like and credible observations about editing. Apollo believers can take solace in case made by Bad Astronomy blog. It's all in the image, whether you believe it's real!

The Daily Galaxy article returns to a three year saga, an exhaustive search for tapes from camera used on the Moon:

"After the camera recorded the Apollo 11 astronauts' descent onto the moon's surface, they placed it on the moon to record their other activities, beaming images back to Earth by the lunar camera that is still resting on the moon's dusty Sea of Tranquility, right where Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin left it. Following NPR's reports in 2006 that the video tapes were missing , NASA began a massive search to find the tapes from the lunar camera."

The article builds reader's hope for discovery of vintage tapes of lunar landscape in odd video format of the day and converted to digital to everyone's delight! Alas, there's not that happy ending - or discovery - only consolation of digitally enhanced broadcast footage. There's also regret tapes were most likely recorded over and reused for subsequent satellite missions that ran tape continuously. It seems a propaganda piece, doubts linger about sixties tech and an improbable lunar lander! The layers of deception may not stop here, though. We may not gone to the Moon with rocket tech, but what of other means? The present writer remembers a time when anti-gravity was shared with public and in the press only to go silent in the early sixties!

kubrick's odyssey: a11 faked moon landing?

Jay Weidner does a masterful job in his essay, "How Stanley Kubrick Faked the Moon Landings: ... ", exposing Hollywood trickery evident in the dated Front Screen Projection effect, and contended, used in the sixties on the Apollo 11 Moon shots.  "All I am trying to do, with the following evidence, is show that the Apollo landings were a hoax. And that Stanley Kubrick, using the Front Screen Projection system, directed them," says Weidner.  The author believes the United States traveled to the moon, but not by means of conventional rocket science. This third position occupied by Weidner views the NASA Space Program as a cover for the anti-gravity propulsion secrets, our government wanted to keep from their Cold War nemesis, the USSR.

The author follows up with a shocking interpretation of Kubrick's symbolism in "Secrets of the Shining". Weidner believes the liberties Kubrick took with Stephen King's novel, "The Shining," were intentional attempts to communicate his personal plight. 

Weidner lays it out for the reader. "The Manager tells Jack that his main job is to prevent the Overlook Hotel (America) from appearing like it is decaying. The Manager reiterates that this is Jack's primary responsibility."  Son Danny's vision of the "Gemini" twins (killed by the previous caretaker) on their very first day.  The Apollo sweatshirt worn by Danny.  Jack's deterioration during the course of the movie, a parallel to Kubrick's personal decline while making "2001: A Space Odyssey".  The damaging effect making the movie had on Kubrick's marriage.  Weidner goes so far as to suggest, "...the nickname, or the code name, for the faking of the Apollo Moon Missions was A11?" "All" for Apollo 11 was the first word Jack is typing over and over in the movie.

Kubrick has been communicating far earlier than recent insights into his last film, "Eyes Wide Shut," which some believe resulted in his death? Weidner makes a compelling case and believes the errors in the faked Moon shots were intentional attempts by Stanley Kubrick to reveal the truth.  It's a good read.